| Home | Magazines | Editorial Board | Instruction | Subscribe Guide | Archive | Advertising | Template | Guestbook | Help |
| GONG Zhaoyang,XU Haocheng,WANG Hongwei.Analysis of differences in imaging morphology between asymptomatic cervical kyphosis and cervical kyphosis associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord,2026,(3):275-265. |
| Analysis of differences in imaging morphology between asymptomatic cervical kyphosis and cervical kyphosis associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy |
| Received:September 04, 2025 Revised:December 17, 2025 |
| English Keywords:Cervical kyphosis Asymptomatic Cervical spondylotic myelopathy Cervical sagittal parameters Imaging assessment |
| Fund:2024年度“国家临床重点专科建设项目(疑难脊柱脊髓疾病规范化诊治体系的建立和应用研究)”;2024年上海市东方英才计划青年项目(DFYCQN04);2025年度复旦大学上海医学院“临床名医培育工程”(DGF828030-1/005) |
|
| Hits: 247 |
| Download times: 0 |
| English Abstract: |
| 【Abstract】 Objectives: To compare the differences in cervical sagittal alignment and morphological characteristics between asymptomatic cervical kyphosis and cervical kyphosis in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy(CSM), and to explore potential indicators for distinguishing the two types of kyphosis. Methods: A total of 62 patients(40 males, 22 females; aged 34-76 years, mean 51.9±11.3 years) who exhibited radiological cervical kyphosis and underwent surgical treatment for CSM in the Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University from October 2022 to October 2024 were included. Age- and sex-matched asymptomatic individuals recruited from the physical examination center of our hospital served as the control group(40 males, 22 females; aged 36-73 years, mean 51.9±11.2 years). The differences between the two groups were compared in terms of cervical kyphosis-related parameters(kyphotic segment Cobb angle, the difference between C4-C7 and C2-C4 Cobb angles), overall cervical sagittal parameters[C0-C2 Cobb angle, neck tilt(NT), etc.], intervertebral space angles, vertebral body angles, and the tilt angles of the upper and lower endplates of each vertebra(including C0 slope, C4 lower endplate tilt angle). Results: The Cobb angle of the kyphotic segment in the asymptomatic group(-10.08°±6.72°) was significantly smaller than that in the CSM group(-17.81°±5.28°)(P<0.01). The difference between the C4-C7 and C2-C4 Cobb angles in the asymptomatic group(0.36°±7.04°) was significantly greater than that in the CSM group(-7.83°±13.21°)(P<0.01). The C0-C2 Cobb angle and NT in the asymptomatic group were both significantly smaller than those in the CSM group(P<0.01). The kyphotic angles of the C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 segments in the asymptomatic group were significantly smaller than those in the CSM group(P<0.01, P=0.02, P=0.04), indicating that the kyphosis in the CSM group primarily originated from the loss of anterior intervertebral disc height. The kyphotic angles of C3, C5, and C7 were significantly greater in the asymptomatic group than those in the CSM group(P=0.03, 0.04, and 0.03, respectively), indicating that the kyphosis in the asymptomatic group was mainly attributed to vertebral wedging. In the asymptomatic group, the C0 slope was significantly greater than that in the CSM group(P<0.01), while the NT value(P<0.01) and the C4 lower endplate tilt angle(P=0.03) were significantly smaller than those in the CSM group. Conclusions: The kyphosis in CSM patients is concentrated in the C4-C7 segments and is characterized by a larger local angle. Conversely, asymptomatic cervical kyphosis is more commonly observed in the C2-C4 segments and primarily originates from vertebral wedging. C0 slope, NT, and C4 lower endplate tilt angle can serve as potential differential parameters. |
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
|
|