SUN Chi,WANG Hongli,JIANG Jianyuan.Analysis of lumbar interbody cage′s length based on anatomic measurement[J].Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord,2016,(7):627-634.
Analysis of lumbar interbody cage′s length based on anatomic measurement
Received:April 11, 2016  Revised:July 08, 2016
English Keywords:Lumbar vertebrae  Tomography  X-ray computed  Interbody cage
Fund:2012年上海市科委医学重点项目(编号:12411951201);2013年上海市科技成果转化与产业化项目(编号:13DZ1940502;13DZ1940503);2014年国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81472036)
Author NameAffiliation
SUN Chi Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China 
WANG Hongli 复旦大学附属华山医院骨科 200040 上海市 
JIANG Jianyuan 复旦大学附属华山医院骨科 200040 上海市 
吕飞舟  
马晓生  
夏新雷  
Hits: 3066
Download times: 1751
English Abstract:
  【Abstract】 Objectives: To measure the anatomic parameters of Chinese lumbosacral vertebral endplates(L1-S1), and to explore its significance in the selection of interbody cage′s length used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF). Methods: CT scan and reconstructions of lumbar and sacrum were obtained in 24 healthy adult volunteers. Mid-oblique diameter, max-oblique diameter, max-oblique angle, lat-sagittal diameter and width of apophyseal ring of L1 inferior endplate to S1 superior endplate were measured. Within the same gender and segment, mid-oblique diameter, max-oblique diameter, max-oblique angle and lat-sagittal diameter of the inferior and superior endplates were compared, and the length of the fusion under the different operation methods was calculated. Results: The maximum and minimum mid-oblique diameters were 39.58±2.60mm and 33.38±3.26mm in male, which were 34.89±1.55mm and 30.93±2.99mm in female, the width of apophyseal ring for which was within the range of 6-8mm. The maximum and minimum max-oblique diameters were 48.05±4.62mm and 42.83±2.28mm in male, which were 43.26±3.31mm and 38.00±2.53mm in female, which increased from L1 to S1. The maximum and minimum lat-sagittal diameters were 36.48±3.26mm and 32.11±2.50mm in male, which were 31.75±1.64mm and 28.36±2.32mm in female, the width of apophyseal ring for which was within the range of 5.5-7.5mm. Most of the differences between anatomic parameters of inferior and superior endplates in the same segment(L2-L5) was insignificant except for L1/2 and L5/S1. In L5/S1, there was no significant difference only in lat-oblique diameter(male: P=0.0522, female: P=0.6410). When TLIF was used, the lenght of interbody cage for L1-L4 should be no less than 31mm in male and 27mm in female. As for L4/5, it should be within the range of 30-38mm in male and 26-34mm in female. The range of length was more extensive for L5/S1, with 25-38mm in male and 23-33mm in female. When the cage was inserted, the insertion angle should be closed to max-oblique angle. When PLIF was used, the length of interbody cage for L1-L5 ranged from 28 to 30mm in male and 24 to 26mm in female. As for L5/S1, 26mm in male and 22mm in female were good choices. Conclusions: CT measurement provides the choice of lumbar interbody cage′s length with objective evidences. A preliminary estimation of the length can be made based on the oblique diameter, the lat-sagittal diameter and the width of apophyseal ring.
View Full Text  View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close