Web of Science数据库“椎体成形术后再骨折”前100篇高被引论文的文献计量学分析

Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 highly cited papers from Web of Science database on re-fracture after vertebroplasty

中文关键词:  经皮椎体成形术  经皮椎体后凸成形术  再发椎体骨折  邻近节段骨折  文献计量学

英文关键词:Percutaneous vertebroplasty  Percutaneous kyphoplasty  Re-fracture  Adjacent segment fracture  Bibliometrics

中文摘要:

  【摘要】 目的：通过文献计量学方法，对经皮椎体成形术（percutaneous vertebroplasty，PVP）和经皮椎体后凸成形术（percutaneous kyphoplasty，PKP）术后再骨折（re-fracture，RF）领域高被引论文进行系统性分析，探讨该领域的核心研究力量、合作网络、热点趋势及现存短板。方法：基于Web of Science核心合集数据库，检索1999年~2025年发表的主题涉及PVP、PKP术后再发骨折的相关文献，聚焦被引前100篇论文，采用文献计量学方法，对其被引特征、国家/地区、研究机构、发表期刊、核心作者及关键词演变等进行量化与可视化分析，并采用 Venn图开展研究主题聚类交叉分析。结果：共纳入375篇文献，其中前100篇高被引论文总被引7219次，篇均被引72.19次（25~329次）；中国46篇，其中长庚纪念医院（7篇）、长庚大学（7篇）为主要研究机构；美国22篇，Mayo Clinic（6篇）为主要研究机构；《Spine》杂志贡献最多（12篇）；540位作者中8位为核心贡献者；关键词趋势显示PKP相关研究增长显著；Venn图揭示现有研究多局限于单一领域（如并发症分析、术式对比），跨类别综合研究匮乏。结论：RF领域中美两国独立为核心，跨洲研究匮乏；现有研究多局限于单一维度，交叉整合不足、研究异质性突出。

英文摘要:

  【Abstract】 Objectives: To systematically analyze the top 100 highly cited papers in the Web of Science Core Collection on re-fracture(RF) after percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) using bibliometric methods, aiming to reveal the core research forces, collaboration networks, hotspot and trends, as well as the shortcomings in this field. Methods: Based on the Web of Science Core Collection database, relevant literatures published from 1999 to 2025 on the topics involving RF after PVP and PKP were retrieved. Focusing on the top 100 cited papers, bibliometric methods were adopted to quantitatively and visually analyze their citation characteristics, countries/regions, research institutions, publishing journals, core authors, and keyword evolution. And a cross-analysis of research topic clustering was carried out using Venn graphs. Results: A total of 375 papers were included. Among them, the top 100 highly cited papers were cited 7,219 times in total, with an average of 72.19 citations per paper(range: 25-329). Among the to 100 highly cited papers, China pulished 46 papers, and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(7 papers) and Chang Gung University(7 papers) were the main research institutions; The United States published 22 papers, with the Mayo Clinic(6 papers) as the main research institution. Spine contributed the most(12 papers); Among 540 authors, 8 were core contributors. Keyword trends showed a significant increase in PKP-related research. Venn diagrams revealed that existing research was mostly limited to single areas(such as complication analysis, surgical method comparison), and cross-category comprehensive research was scarce. Conclusions: In the RF field, the United States and China are the independent cores, and there is a lack of intercontinental research. The existing research is mostly limited to a single dimension, with insufficient cross-integration and prominent research heterogeneity.