邱旭升,鲍虹达,刘 臻,邱 勇.马凡综合征伴脊柱畸形患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面的形态特征[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,(2):97-102. |
马凡综合征伴脊柱畸形患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面的形态特征 |
Spino-pelvic alignment in patients with spinal deformity secondary to Marfan syndrome |
投稿时间:2013-12-27 修订日期:2014-01-26 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 马凡综合征 脊柱畸形 矢状面 骨盆 |
英文关键词:Marfan syndrome Spinal deformity Sagittal Pelvis |
基金项目:南京市医学科技发展项目(JQX12005) |
|
摘要点击次数: 3671 |
全文下载次数: 2371 |
中文摘要: |
【摘要】 目的:探索马凡综合征伴脊柱畸形患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面的形态特征。方法:收集以脊柱畸形来我院就诊的马凡综合征患者35例,男18例,女17例,年龄10~20岁,平均14.4±2.3岁。在站立位全脊柱侧位X线片上测量脊柱及骨盆矢状面参数,包括:(1)胸椎后凸角(thoracic kyphosis,TK),(2)胸腰段后凸角(thoracolumbar kyphosis,TL),(3)腰椎前凸角(lumbar lodorsis,LL),(4)骨盆入射角(pelvic incidence,PI),(5)骨盆倾斜角(pelvic tilt,PT),(6)骶骨倾斜角(sacral slope,SS),(7)矢状面平衡(sagittal vertical axis,SVA)。定义顶椎在T12、L1或者T12/L1椎间盘,后凸角度>10°的后凸为胸腰段后凸;顶椎在L1/2椎间盘或以下椎体、椎间盘,后凸角度>10°的后凸为腰椎后凸。采用Sponseller分型方法对患者脊柱矢状面形态进行分型,比较不同分型患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面形态。结果:本组患者在冠状面上以胸腰双弯(40.0%)、单胸弯(22.8%)以及三弯(20.0%)最常见,最大Cobb角43°~165°,平均75.2°±26.0°。在脊柱矢状面上,TK为-25°~73°(19.0°±24.1°),其中胸椎后凸正常者(20°≤TK≤50°)10例(28.6%);胸椎后凸增大患者(TK>50°)5例(14.3%);胸椎后凸减小者(0°≤TK<20°)13例(37.1%);另有7例(20.0%)患者表现为胸椎前凸。TL为-25°~73°(14.0°±19.0°);LL为-17°~70°(37.1°±23.3°);SVA为-9.0~7.2cm(-2.0±4.3cm)。15例(42.9%)患者表现为胸腰段后凸或腰椎后凸(9例ⅡA型,6例ⅡB型),5例患者表现为后凸区明显的椎体楔形变。骨盆矢状面上,PI为25°~74°(40.1°±12.7°);PT为-12°~34°(6.9°±9.6°);SS为14°~68°(33.3°±12.6°)。Sponseller分型Ⅰ型患者TK、LL、PI、SS明显大于Ⅱ型患者,而Ⅱ型患者TL明显大于Ⅰ型患者。未见腰椎滑脱现象。结论:马凡综合征伴脊柱畸形患者脊柱-骨盆矢状面形态差异较大,手术医生应该根据不同分型制定不同的手术策略。 |
英文摘要: |
【Abstract】 Objectives: To investigate the spino-pelvic alignment in Marfan syndrome patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 35 patients with spinal deformity secondary to Marfan syndrome(18 males and 17 females), the average age was 14.4±2.3 years(10-20). The following spinal and pelvic parameters were measured on the standing lateral radiographs of the whole spine: (1)thoracic kyphosis(TK), (2)thoracolumbar kyphosis(TL), (3)lumbar lodorsis(LL), (4)pelvic incidence(PI), (5)pelvic tilt(PT), (6)sacral slope(SS), (7)sagittal vertical axis(SVA). The thoracolumbar kyphosis was defined as the kyphosis Cobb angle larger than 10° and the apex sitting at T12, L1 or T12/L1 disc; the lumbar kyphosis was defined as the kyphosis Cobb angle larger than 10° and the apex below L1/2 disc. The patients were divided into two groups according to Sponseller′s classification, and the spino-pelvic parameters were compared between two groups. Results: In the frontal plane, the most common curve types were double major(40.0%), thoracic(22.8%) and triple(20.0%), and the mean maximum Cobb angle was 75.2°±26.0°(43°-165°). In the sagittal plane of the spine, the TK was 19.0°±24.1°(-25°-73°), 28.6%(10/35) for normal thoracic kyphosis(20°≤TK≤50°), 14.3%(5/35) for hyperkyphosis(TK>50°), 37.1%(13/35) for hypokyphosis(0°≤TK<20°), and 20.0%(7/35) for thoracic lordosis. TL was 14.0°±19.0°(-25°-73°); LL was 37.1°±23.3°(-17°-70°); SVA was -9.0-7.2cm(-2.0±4.3cm). According to our definition, 42.9%(15/35, 9 type ⅡA, 6 type ⅡB) of cases had thoracolumbar kyphosis or lumbar kyphosis, and 5 presented with vertebral wedging. In the sagittal plane of the pelvis, PI was 40.1°±12.7°(25°-74°); PT was 6.9°±9.6°(-12°-34°); SS was 33.3°±12.6°(14°-68°). Type Ⅰ had larger TK, LL, PI, SS than type Ⅱ, while type Ⅱ had larger TL and PT than type Ⅰ. Furthermore, there was no spondylolisthesis occurred in this series. Conclusions: The patients with Marfan syndrome differ greatly in the spino-pelvic alignments, which indicate different surgical strategies according to different spino-pelvic alignments. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|