毛宁方,石志才,朱晓东,张晔,章筛林.全脊椎切除术后三种不同重建方法的稳定性比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,(6):.
全脊椎切除术后三种不同重建方法的稳定性比较
Comparative study of three kinds of reconstructed spinal stability after total spondylectomy
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  脊柱  全脊椎切除术  重建  稳定性
英文关键词:Spine  Total spondylectomy  Reconstruction  Stabilization
基金项目:
毛宁方  石志才  朱晓东  张晔  章筛林
上海长海医院骨科,上海市200433
摘要点击次数: 4825
全文下载次数: 3626
中文摘要:
  目的:评价全脊椎切除术后应用三种不同重建方式对脊柱稳定性的影响。方法:选用6具新鲜尸体T9~L3脊柱标本,建立T12全脊椎切除模型.进行三种不同的前后方重建:(1)前方人工椎体+后方椎弓根螺钉固定;(2)前方人工椎体、钢板+后方椎弓根螺钉固定;(3)前方骨水泥-螺钉复合体+后方椎弓根螺钉固定。采用非损伤性加载对完整标本和三种重建方式下的每个脊柱标本的稳定性进行测试。结果:三种方法重建术后在4N载荷下T11~Ll各运动方向的平均运动范围均较完整标本小(P〈0.001),三种重建方式之间无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。结论:全脊椎切除术后三种重建方式均可以重建脊柱的稳定性。
英文摘要:
  Objective:To evaluate the effect of three kinds of reconstructed spinal stability after total spondylectomy.Method:Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines(T9-L3) were used.A total spondylectomy was performed at T12.Three potential reconstruction technique
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=4df16c4aecb83e86a72afbd3bb0f89929dd2b53b39ef821122ec3689656be073baf1dc8088b808f4eece80d58670ad1992d00b4e28f56b1f4b62c2d562aaf413570791f0cb9355ad37444809be616e917584f69fc84ecd06bece85ed0e46650a&pcid=3b2e4763797f121df1e5c0ba55cffa7b&cid=b38b646414cdcf7db2ea2d31acb25be6&jid=5fdf8640490760c406b420309027a8f7&yid=4cb9ed13c852d184ed3015383f5e5a1c&aid=83540538FEC0CFE9&vid=&iid=aa5cd42a1ef46c56e770d99b69bbf825&sid=&eid=&fileno=200706209&flag=1&is_more=0"> var my_pcid="3b2e4763797f121df1e5c0ba55cffa7b"; var my_cid="b38b646414cdcf7db2ea2d31acb25be6"; var my_jid="5fdf8640490760c406b420309027a8f7"; var my_yid="4cb9ed13c852d184ed3015383f5e5a1c"; var my_aid="83540538FEC0CFE9";